ADJUDICATION OFFICER Recommendation on dispute under Industrial Relations Act 1969
Investigation Recommendation Reference: IR - SC - 00000986
| Worker | Employer |
Anonymised Parties | Worker | Employer |
Representatives | Self | IBEC |
Dispute:
Act | Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1969 | IR - SC - 00000986 | 06/01/2023 |
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Marie Flynn
Date of Hearing: 21/02/2024
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 (as amended) following the referral of the dispute to me by the Director General, I inquired into the dispute and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any information relevant to the dispute.
Background:
The Employer proposes to change the Worker’s method of payment from cheque to Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT). The Employer wrote to the Worker on 15 January 2024 to offer a €400 once-off goodwill gesture, subject to him agreeing to moving to EFT. The Worker rejected the offer. |
Summary of Workers Case:
The Worker submits that he has been paid by cheque for almost 18 years. He further submits that payment by cheque is a legal form of payment. The Worker submits that if he were to be paid by EFT, as proposed by his Employer, he would incur bank charges and fees which he does not currently incur. The Worker further submits that his Employer is acting in breach of his employment contract. The Worker submits that a number of his colleagues have resolved a similar complaint under the auspices of the Labour Court but that he was not party to that case. |
Summary of Employer’s Case:
The Employer wishes to change the Worker’s method of payment from cheque to EFT as the Worker is the only employee being paid by cheque and the processing of payment by cheque is administratively burdensome for the Employer. Having all employees paid by EFT would streamline the payroll administrative function and would be a more secure and efficient method of payment. Joint cheque signatories are not always available on site (due to flexible working arrangements) which occasionally results in blank cheques being signed in advance of wage calculations being complete. In 2022, there was a similar dispute involving five of the Employer’s Workers who were paid in cash and the Employer proposed changing the payment method to EFT. The matter was referred to the Labour Court for recommendation. The Court recommended a €400 once-off payment to each of the Workers in return for their agreement. The Recommendation was accepted by the Workers and the move to EFT was implemented. |
Conclusions:
In conducting my investigation, I have taken into account all relevant submissions presented to me by the parties. In making my recommendation, I am guided by the Labour Court Recommendation concerning five of the Worker’s colleagues who also objected to moving from cheque payment to EFT. In that case, the Labour Court considered the matter and recommended that “a ‘once-off’ gesture payment of €400 be paid by the Employer to each of the 5 Workers concerned in return for their agreement to move to a system of wage payment by inter-bank credit transfer”. |
Recommendation:
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 requires that I make a recommendation in relation to the dispute.
I recommend, in line with the Labour Court’s Recommendation cited above, that the Worker accepts the Employer’s offer of a once-off payment of €400 in return for his agreement to move from cheque payment to Electronic Funds Transfer. |
Dated: 01/03/2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Marie Flynn
Key Words:
Method of payment |